California Personal Injury Law Case Notes : California Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney : Kristine Meredith : The Danko Law Firm : Car Accidents & Product Liability

Proposition 213 became law in 1996.  That law says that an uninsured driver who is injured in an auto accident  may not recover certain damages due her, even though the accident was entirely the fault of the other driver.  The damages the innocent driver is prohibited from collecting are her non-economic damages, which include pain and suffering.

The insurance companies passed Prop 213 to save money and maximize profits at the expense of the driver who was not at fault in an accident. The only exception: an uninsured driver my collect damages for pain and suffering if the negligent driver who caused the accident is later convicted of drunk driving.

By its terms, Prop 213 applies to those uninsured drivers who were actually at the wheel when they were struck by another driver.  But courts have  applied this law broadly to keep compensation from drivers who weren't even in their cars when the accident took place.  For example, courts have ruled that Prop 213 deprives uninsured drivers of the right to be compensated for the injuries even if they were outside their parked car when they were run down. 

Given the harsh results, it is important  that all drivers carry liability insurance on their cars and trucks.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

A recent study shows for the first time that post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can be objectively diagnosed using magnetoencephalography (MEG), a non-invasive measurement of magnetic fields in the brain. Researchers at the University of Minnesota and Minneapolis VA Medical Center published a study this month in the Journal of Neural Engineering identifying a biological marker in the brains of those exhibiting symptoms of PTSD.  Conventional brain scans such as an X-ray, CT scan, or MRI are unable to detect PTSD.

According to one of the rearchers, Dr. Apostolos Georgopoulos,

These findings document robust differences in brain function between the PTSD and control groups that can be used for differential diagnosis and which possess the potential for assessing and monitoring disease progression and effects of therapy.

In addition to diagnosing those with PTSD, the researchers also were able to judge the severity of  the patient’s suffering. 

Attorneys representing accident victims suffering from PTSD may be able to use these imaging techniques to support their clients' claims for pain and suffering  against those responsible for causing their accidents.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

As discussed here, damages awarded to a victim usually include the cost of medical services. Most victims who have private health insurance may have paid very little (ie. co-payment) compared to the amount the doctors or hospitals bill to the health insurer for the services. And, the health insurer also pays a lower rate than the amount that appears on the bill. For many years, attorneys representing the wrongdoer have asked the courts to award the victims the lowest amounts --the reduced sum paid by the health insurer.

Recently, the Court has ruled in favor of the victim and awarded the higher amount -- what the doctor or hospital billed for the medical services. Put simply: the victim has paid a premium for the insurance and the wrongdoer should not receive a windfall for the victim's thrift and foresight in securing insurance. The cost of medical services include "in-kind" benefits to the health insurance companies. The victim deserves the full benefit of his insurance.

The Court has found the following information helpful in allowing the victim to recover the full amount of medical expenses:

Written agreements between the victim and the medical service providers:

• Registration Form
• Financial Agreement
• Conditions Admission
• Insurance Verification
• Amounts Collected
• Amounts Due
• Financial Counselor's Notes
• Bills from medical services providers
• Agreements between the medical service providers and health insurance company to accept reduced payments as payment in full
• Agreements between victim and health insurance company re payments and indemnity (benefits agreement, enrollment information, etc.)
  

The court may also expect the victim or a family member to present evidence of steps taken to keep track of injury-related medical bills. And a doctor will usually need to testify that the billing records were a fair and reasonable representation of the medical billings.  

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

When a jury finds that a wrongdoer is responsible for the victim's injury, then the Judge will ask the jury to decide how much money will compensate the victim for his injuries.  The law refers to the compensation award as “damages” and has divided them into two categories: economic and non-economic.

Economic injuries/damages include:

·        Past medical expenses -- the reasonable cost of reasonably necessary medical care related to the victim’s injury.

·        Future medical expenses -- the reasonable cost of reasonably necessary medical care for the victim’s medical care in the future

·        Loss of earning capacity – Past and future  loss of  – the reasonable value of the victim’s loss of the ability to earn money as a result of the injury

Non-Economic injuries/damages include:

·        Pain and suffering

·        Loss of consortium -- loss of a spouse's companionship and services, including:

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

The spouse of a victim who has been physically injured may be entitled to compensation from whoever caused the injury. The spouse may be compensated for the following  losses of family relationship also known as "loss of consortium":

• love, 
• companionship,
• comfort, 
• care,
• assistance,
• protection,
• affection,
• society,
• moral support,
• enjoyment of sexual relations
• or the ability to have children. 

The wrongdoer who caused the injury need not compensate the victim's spouse for any of the following:

• The loss of financial support from the victim,
• Personal services, such as nursing, that the spouse has provided or will provide to the victim, or
• Any loss of earnings that the spouse has suffered by giving up employment to take care of the victim.

In California the following individuals may not recover for  the family relationship or "societal" losses due to  their loved one's injury.

• A parent may not recover relationship losses for injury to his or her child,
• Unmarried cohabitants may not recover damages for societal loss.

In the unfortunate situation where a married couple separates after the accident, the spouse of the victim may seek limited compensation (ie. the loss of assistance in parenting). 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

Today a consumer rights group reports on the risks of blood clots, strokes, and heart attacks that Yaz and Yasmin pose to women using these birth control pills.  The California-based group, called The Civil Justice Research Project, also reports on the the federal lawsuits that have been filed against Bayer by the hundreds of women who have suffered serious injury after taking Yaz.  The story mentions our co-counsel on the Yaz cases, A.J. De Bartolemeo of Girard Gibbs, and quotes Mike Danko:

Bayer just isn't telling women what they need to know.  No woman would take Yaz if she knew that it was no more effective than other birth control pills but was more risky.

The article talks about the "corrective" ad campaign the FDA required Bayer to run, noting that -- at least  according to some -- Bayer's corrective commercials were "too confusing and jargon-filled to be effective." The article links to one of the commercials.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

The Consumer Attorneys of California (formerly called The Trial Lawyers of California), named my partner Trial Attorney of the Year Finalist for 2009 in honor of our work for a brain injured client in the case of Burdett v. Teledyne Continental Motors.  The Trial Lawyers Association presented a video about the case at its annual convention awards dinner in San Francisco.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

One would assume that if a TBI victim cannot remember the injury producing event, he cannot suffer flashbacks or nightmares re-experiencing the event. Right? Wrong.

Indeed, a diagnosis of a TBI generally requires a loss of consciousness. But the victim's loss of consciousnesss does not shield him from post traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD.  Apparently PTSD can occur after a TBI, but the TBI may alter the symptoms' development.  A TBI victim's symptoms may relate to events that just preceded his loss of consciousness, or to events that occurred immediately after.  The symptoms may even relate to details about the trauma-producing event itself that the victim learned about later in his recovery.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

Even after the physical injuries have healed, an accident victim may still suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).  She may continue to experience flashbacks, nightmares, or daydreams in which the traumatic event is replayed again and again. The person may also suffer an abnormally intense “startle response” – like a rush of anxiety that bursts from her brain and shoots to her fingertips accompanied by a rapid heart rate. Other symptoms of PTSD may include impaired memory and difficulty concentrating and insomnia (or even a fear of sleeping due to the nightmares). The trauma of the accident disrupts various intellectual and emotional processes. It is sometimes referred to as "a normal reaction to abnormal event."

PTSD symptoms are among those that may be included in an award for pain and suffering as discussed here.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks